We can say with certainty it wasn't Iran...

On Monday in New Delhi, an explosion tore through an Israeli diplomatic vehicle, wounding the driver and a diplomat's wife, according to Indian officials. On the same day in the former Soviet republic of Georgia, authorities say attackers planted an explosive device on the car of a driver for the Israeli Embassy, but it was discovered and defused before it went off (Reuters).

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was quick to place the blame on Iran and added that Iran is "the greatest exporter of terror in the world." Of course, Western Media without any investigation or research conveyed the same sentiment. Nothing should come as a surprise here.

Israeli white supremacy--Yes, Israelis are white supremacists, how else would anyone explain the apartheid system they have in place--cannot accept any findings brown colored sub-gentile Indian investigators would find. But what about Western media, is it too run by white supremacists? It would have made sense for the media to take cues from Indian investigators before making pervasive accusations against Iran.

Indian investigators are well trained. Let's not forget, this isn't the first bombing in India. India has suffered attacks from Hindu, Sikh, and Muslim terror groups. Juan Cole writes, "Indian investigators are first rate. Based on the modus operandi, their initial thesis is that the attack was the work of the “Indian Mujahidin” group. It had used a similar remote controlled sticky bomb, placed by a motorcyclist, in an attack on Taiwanese tourists outside the Jama Masjid cathedral mosque in 2010. IM is a [Wahaabi group], not connected to Iran, and doesn't like Shiite Muslims."

India is Iran’s economic lifeline, and Tehran would not likely risk such an operation at this time. As Juan Cole points out, "India gets 12% of its oil from Iran and sees an $8 billion annual export opportunity in filling the trade vacuum left by unilateral US and European boycotts of Iran. Contrary to a bad Reuters article, Indian officials denied Tuesday that the bombing would affect trade ties."

But is there a connection between Israel and Wahaabi terror groups? They can't really be working together, can they? On January 1, 2012, the Israeli newspaper, "Haaretz" reported:

Israeli Mossad agents posed as CIA officers in order to recruit members of a Pakistani terror group to carry out assassinations and attacks against the regime in Iran, Foreign Policy revealed on Friday, quoting U.S. intelligence memos.

[...]

[Foreign Policy's Mark Perry] quotes a number of American intelligence officials and claims that the Mossad agents used American dollars and U.S. passports to pose as CIA spies to try to recruit members of Jundallah, a Pakistan-based Sunni extremist organization that has carried out a series of attacks in Iran and assassinations of government officials.

Now isn't that an interesting development. Why haven't we heard of this report more regularly cited in the Western media? Beyond the scope of this piece, there are plenty of conclusions we can draw from this report. Besides the obvious one that Israel and Wahaabi terror groups are in cahoots with each other; the other conclusion is -- Wahaabi terror groups are willing to work with US intelligence agencies. And we were gullible to think America was the enemy.

So what was the US response to these findings. Absolutely nothing.

According to the intelligence officer, a senior administration official vowed to "take the gloves off" with Israel, but ultimately the U.S. did nothing.
"In the end it was just easier to do nothing than to, you know, rock the boat," the intelligence officer said.

Is America an Israeli colony? It's hard to say otherwise with evidence such as this.

Let's go back to Mr. Netanyahu assertion about Iran being "the greatest exporter of terror in the world," this sounds more like an example of the psychological disorder of displacement. Displacement is an unconscious defense mechanism whereby the mind redirects effects from an object felt to be dangerous or unacceptable to an object felt to be safe or acceptable. So consider his statement as more of a confession, confessing to Israeli terrorism.